I've looked at the facts of the case, and it seems clear to me that Gawker was g...

openasocket on July 31, 2017 | parent | context | favorite | on: The R. Kelly ‘cult’ story and the ‘Gawker Effect’

I've looked at the facts of the case, and it seems clear to me that Gawker was guilty of an invasion of privacy, and the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Can you give me an argument, based on the facts of the case, that Gawker did not commit those violations?