Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>>If people are no longer free to use words or social stigma to advance their views and opinion, because "tolerance," then what do we have left?

I agree with you. But we cannot disregard the dishonest behaviour performed by most leftists/liberals over the years. The leftists/liberals hurl so much social stigma against the republicans/Christianity but they dishonestly and criminally keep mum about e.g. Islam. Sam Harris and Bill Maher have pointed this out beautifully at [1] and [2].

The leftists have never allowed anyone to socially stigmatize Muslims about their faith in the very vicious, barbaric and most importantly "the most intolerant" ideology of Islam. So now this has came around them.

Mainstream left/liberal camp is completely dishonest about its take on the issue of intolerance of Islam.

Sadly but not surprisingly people like Trump will succeed to exploit such thing.

The saner people in the left should reflect on this dishonest behaviour of the mainstream/vocal leftists and must do something about it, else the intolerance will just grow.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YCWf0tHy7M

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL8rZTuGfZo



To claim that Islam is somehow innately "vicious" or "barbaric" is just insulting.


>>To claim that Islam is somehow innately "vicious" or "barbaric" is just insulting.

First a question: Insulting to whom?

If you think it is insulting to Muslims, then I disagree. It may be offensive to some Muslims. Will criticizing Nazism be considered as insulting (to Germans)?


The false equivalency is strong in this partisan hack.


I am not making the equivalency, it was an example to illustrate my point that criticizing an ideology should not be seen as insulting some people.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: