Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Does anyone know if Google ended up changing their behavior on this?

I'm struggling to see why this is a legitimate design decision on their part - how is downloading a new copy every hour different from maintaining a persistent cache wherever they are storing it after download?



> Since these URLs are private, Google does not want to store them anywhere permanently in the Google servers.


Yeah, I read that part, I just don't understand it. They are obviously storing the contents of the image somewhere (in memory?) for an hour, otherwise there's no point prefetching it in the first place. At the end of that hour, they download it again. If the image isn't different, they would be better off not throwing away the old copy.


They should've at least implemented lazy loading, i.e only fetch the thumbs the user is looking at.


Google hasn't exactly been known to put users' privacy in front of gaining more information about them, though...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: